1. Frequently contests
want to use not only the winner’s image but the images of anyone who
enters the contest.
Using all images entered for advertising for
the contest or the particular event and its promotion is one of the first
clues I look for when reading the rules or terms and conditions. You could
argue that the winners are getting a form of payment by receiving a prize
for winning and this may be a reasonable usage for the winners but not
necessarily for the entire body of entrants. It is usually done without
credit or any kind of payment.
2. Usage in any and
all media now known or known in the future.
That is a lot of usage that they can get for a relatively small prize when
you think about it. What about stock photographers or other professionals
that normally would have been paid for usage of their images? That is
possibly a huge amount of money that they can save when they are creating a
large photo library for their own use.
3. The biggest red flag of all is the phrase “in perpetuity” and that means forever and ever they have the right to use your image, because you chose to enter it into a contest—you gave it to them. Frequently there is added terminology that says they won’t give you credit, or any compensation or even a notification that they are using your image … and, if it is a really good image, they could be using it or selling it over and over again.
4. Then there is the
phrase that indicates that they can assign the rights.
Those are the same rights that you granted to them by
entering their contest. This means that they can sell or give away
your copyrighted image to anyone…for any purpose. This means that they
could sell and resell the reproduction rights to your image in any way and
to anyone and to wherever they want to sell it. It doesn’t seem fair to me
that you do the work, maybe even pay them for submitting to the contest and
they receive your image rights for free. And to top it off, they can
generate income from your image and you get zip.
Then there is one contest I saw that doesn’t even have a prize, but proclaims loudly that the winner will get the privilege of gracing the cover of their product’s box. Advertising is expensive indeed and if your image is that good and valuable to them then they should be paying you for using it in their advertising!
5. Contest Participants irrevocably forfeit rights of privacy, intellectual property rights or other legal rights that would preclude Promoter or affiliates from using the submitted image.
ARE THEY KIDDING? Right of privacy, legal rights?
Here is an example of where it could become spooky, because you could have not only the photo/s, but your name, address, likeness, biographic material published without any control by you.
Let’s say you have a great photo of your daughter or son and want to enter that into a contest with rules like this. Image usage can be sold and resold and that photo of your child might just end up being used in some unsavory way and you might just have your name and address and personal information published right along with it without your knowledge or consent or control. There would be no recourse or protection from this. Now maybe I’m letting my imagination go crazy, but better that then other possibly dire consequences.
6. They can also demand that in order to enter the contest the Participant agrees that he/she will never sue or assert any claim against the Promoter’s use of the submitted image.
7. How about this one: all entries become the property of …..(contest promoter). They aren’t being a bit shy about what they want here.
|
|
8. Or maybe these words: including but not limited to …! Those words usually precede a laundry list of things that they might want to do. This phrase leaves the gate wide open to do anything that they didn’t think of in the first place. Let me give you an example of that: including, but not limited to, the right to copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, edit, translate, reformat, and/or incorporate into a collective work.
Here is a variation of this one: All winning photos become the property of XXXX and may not be published anywhere else without their specific written consent (including any other internet sites) by XXXX. If you do then you forfeit the prizes. The way this one is written, you could not even put your own image up on your own website without their permission.
9. Here are some other words that are unacceptable: assigns, agents and licensees (this virtually can include anyone to whom they want to give your copyright) a worldwide (there are lots of good and lucrative markets in other parts of the world), royalty-free (no payment), non-exclusive (any one can have it) , sub licensable (you give it to them, they sell it to Joe who can sell it to Sally who can sell it to Suzy, etc.), unconditional (no restrictions of any kind on where, when or how it can be used (think alcohol, tobacco products or other products and/or services that you might not want to support in any way) and transferable right and license (see sub licensable above).
Here are some more:
Reproduce,
encode, store, modify, copy, transmit, publish, post, broadcast, display,
publicly perform, adapt, exhibit and/or otherwise use or reuse (without
limitation, as to when or to the number of times used),
the Participant’s name, address, image, likeness, statements,
biographical material in contest promotions...




